Brownfield registers
To keep track of previously developed sites, the government requires English local planning authorities (LPAs) to keep up-to-date brownfield registers. Brownfield registers set out all of the brownfield sites that are available and potentially suitable for residential development in England. This register is publicly available and aims to provide greater certainty for developers and communities as well as encouraging greater investment in local areas.
Some sites within the brownfield land register that are deemed suitable by the LPA for residential development can be granted permission for residential development via a two-stage process. Firstly Permission in Principle (PiP) for development is sought. In a similar method to obtaining outline planning permission, this establishes that the fundamental principles of development are accepted by the LPA. Secondly, a 'technical details consent' would be required to determine the detailed elements of a scheme prior to development of the site. The government’s online Planning Practice Guidance provides further information on PiP here.
Utilising previously developed land for new development is seen as a way of making a more efficient and sustainable use of land. The government therefore often seeks to direct development to such sites in preference to development on greenfield sites.
PDL and the green belt
Indeed, in regard to plan-making, the NPPF clarifies that as part of the consideration of the release of green belt land for development, local plans should give priority to PDL, then consider ‘grey belt’ land which is not previously developed, and then other green belt locations (paragraph 148).
Notwithstanding and subject to proposals not causing substantial harm to the ‘openness’ of the green belt, the NPPF sets out that the partial or complete redevelopment of PDL (including a material change of use to residential or mixed use including residential) is acceptable in the green belt (paragraph 154).
Considerations for developers
There are different considerations for developers when evaluating the suitability of a previously developed site for development. This includes cost implications such as remediating potential contamination risks and site clearance implications on previously development land. Although, the necessary infrastructure including connections to facilities, highway access, and proximity to services may already be available which can assist with site deliverability.
Ultimately though, the government’s preference is clear, that previously developed land should be prioritised for development before greenfield sites.
Further information
Contact Sean Lewis or Alison Murrell
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)

.jpg)

.jpg)
.jpg)
.jpg)
